“The court declines to find as a matter of law that a reasonable investor would have derived any expectation of profit from general cryptocurrency market trends, as opposed to Ripple’s efforts to facilitate XRP’s use in cross-border payments, among other things,” Hamilton wrote. “Accordingly, the [court] cannot find as a matter of law that Ripple’s conduct would not have led a reasonable investor to have an expectation of profit due to the efforts of others.”
Blockchain Powers Jack Ma’s $8-B Ant Group Energy Asset Strategy
Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure According to Bloomberg, Ant Digital Technologies has...