Binance and Zhao, more commonly known as “CZ,” filed a reply to the SEC, alongside Binance.US, which submitted its own separate, but similar, filing arguing that the SEC did not show that the exchanges’ U.S. customers had any contracts that would meet the definition of an “investment contract,” or that other elements of the Supreme Court case were met.
Juiced USDS Yields Woo Solana Traders to Sky’s Stablecoin
The heady growth is about as preordained as anything could be in DeFi. Sky is spending $2 million a month...