In the absence of “actual issuers” of the “scam tokens,” the plaintiffs argued that Uniswap facilitated the trades at issue by “providing a marketplace and facilities for bringing together buyers and sellers of securities” for a transaction fee, “hoping that this Court might overlook the fact that the current state of cryptocurrency regulation leaves them without recourse, at least as to the specific claims alleged in this suit.”
Ethereum’s ETH Price Rally Prompts $300M Inflows to Crypto Exchanges, Likely a Sign of Profit-Taking
Tuesday was also the third day in a row of inflows, marking a break from the general trend of decreasing...